Войти в почту

Americans Turned Putin's Statement on Its Head

This is for Saturday News, where in the program's beginning, we will return to what, we think is very bad, that is occurring against our will, next to the very Russian borders. And we will return specifically, to what appeared to be almost a joke, which our program pointed out almost a month ago. Then we were looking for the American aircraft carrier Carl Vinson, about which Trump menacingly said that he was moving towards North Korea, but it ended up in a more peaceful place. In which... Well, let's open a map of the Pacific Ocean region. So in the beginning, our English colleagues spotted Carl Vinson here. Where's Korea and there resorts? But by the 20th of April, appeared in ​​Sulawesi Sea. And at the end of April in the Philippine Sea. Now it's somewhere to the south of Japan, and is moving towards Korea. And as far as we know, in the past 24 hours, from here, from the Japanese port of Yokosuka a second American aircraft carrier, Ronald Reagan, departed which is going on joint maneuvers with the very same Carl Vinson. The aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan is the one on which a month ago, US Vice President Pence told sailors how Washington would pressure North Korea with strictly diplomatic and economic methods. But since then the situation has changed, and as can be seen from general statements the US is moving to open military pressure on North Korea. Two aircraft carriers are moving, really moving, to its shores. So what has changed? Let's return to our map. But now we will need a slightly different perspective, Yes, we have it here, and so, what has changed? North Korea carried out a new missile launch. One, that the rocket leaving from here, fell here, 60 km from our very own Vladivostok. But this launch showed specialists that such a rocket is fully capable of reaching this island, Guam, belonging to the US, where the largest base of strategic US aviation is located. But secondly, the situation is changing in the US, and in this case not in Guam, but in Washington. Overall I fear, our program shares the concern that a small war victory against North Korea, is a move that may be advised to President Trump, to divert attention from what is happening around him at home, in Washington. Of course a small war in Korea is unlikely, but Trump is receiving a lot of pressure at home. Yesterday, again without naming sources, The New York Times was claiming the following, that during the talks with Lavrov, Trump not only gave him some secrets, but also linked with Russia the firing of the FBI director. Even after a week, everything keeps continuing: evil Russia, which has Trump almost running errands. We'll remind you that Putin talked about this. In the US, a political schizophrenia is developing, and there is no other way that I can explain, the accusations of the current president in that he was giving or gave Lavrov some secrets. Incidentally, I spoke with him on this subject today, I will have to reprimand him, because he did not share these secrets with us, neither with me, nor with representatives of Russia's special services, which is very not nice of him. Moreover, moreover, if the United States administration finds it possible, we are ready to provide the recording of the conversation between Lavrov and Trump, to the US Senate and the Congress. Of course, if the US administration will want it. In the beginning, when we saw how this process of internal political struggle is developing, it was funny to us. Today it's not just sad, it causes us concern, because what else can those people come up with, who generate such nonsense, such absurdity. It's hard to imagine, all this is done on the basis of inciting anti-Russian sentiments. The editorial position of our US colleagues is such that, even this statement of Putin was quickly twisted. Like before this there was a tempest in a teacup around Trump's photo with Lavrov, so now they've clung to Putin's expression: "recording of the conversation." Supposedly, the Russians came to the US President with sound recording equipment? To begin with, "record of the conversation," is a perfectly regular expression from the diplomacy dictionary. For example, it took me a long time to get used to the fact that many diplomats, Russian and foreign, have a somewhat, astonishing habit, that even during a friendly conversation, they automatically take out a notepad and take notes. And even more so, such recording is done during official negotiations, that's first, and secondly, sound recording in the White house, since the old days, was done by its owners. The first was President Franklin Roosevelt. The microphone was inserted into the lamp, the wires from which went to the basement. With President John F. Kennedy, the microphones were hidden behind curtains. President Eisenhower had a microphone inserted into a fake phone on his desk. President Lyndon Johnson not only recorded his talks, but then also looked at the transcripts. President Nixon's offices were literally wrapped in microphones, and even his country residence. But later these records played against him. Probably, for this reason, the well-known history of audio recordings in the White House ends with Nixon. But this chronicle is quite reliable. In this case we even have a reference in The Washington Post, to the American Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. But in the present, Moscow did not publish its notes, and from the White House only yesterday there was a leak about the American summary. And the leak is again anonymous. But, as we have already said, even before that, our American colleagues began to assert that in a conversation with Lavrov, Trump shared some secrets about a new plan of terrorists from the so called ISIS. We will note ourselves: is this not the information that needs to exchanged in order to save lives? And in the end, didn't the US authorities themselves restrict computers in airplane cabins on flights from the Middle East? This is clearly based on some kind of warning from intelligence services. But in the case of Trump-Lavrov conversation, our US colleagues insist that something more has occurred. Supposedly, that the info that Trump shared, came from Israel. And when he names the city where the information came from, Trump allowed the terrorists to find an Israeli informant in their ranks.

Americans Turned Putin's Statement on Its Head
© Вести.Ru